<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
     xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
     xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
     xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
     xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
     xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
     xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/">
    <channel>
        <title><![CDATA[marijuana DUI - Chadwick, Spensley & Fox]]></title>
        <atom:link href="https://www.chadwickandspensley.com/blog/tags/marijuana-dui/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
        <link>https://www.chadwickandspensley.com/blog/tags/marijuana-dui/</link>
        <description><![CDATA[Chadwick, Spensley & Fox's Website]]></description>
        <lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2025 16:00:31 GMT</lastBuildDate>
        
        <language>en-us</language>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Not So Fast! Cannabis Legalization Does Not Mean Driving While High Is Legal Too]]></title>
                <link>https://www.chadwickandspensley.com/blog/not-so-fast-cannabis-legalization-does-not-mean-driving-while-high-is-legal-too/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.chadwickandspensley.com/blog/not-so-fast-cannabis-legalization-does-not-mean-driving-while-high-is-legal-too/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Chadwick, Spensley & Fox, PLLC]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Fri, 03 May 2024 18:09:00 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Criminal Defense]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Drugged Driving]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[DWH]]></category>
                
                
                    <category><![CDATA[driving while high]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Drugged Driving]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Implied consent laws VT]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[marijuana as schedule 1]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[marijuana DUI]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Vermont DUI]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[vermont dui attorney]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Vermont Implied Consent]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Vermont marijuana legalization]]></category>
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>The announcement&nbsp;by the Federal Government that they intend to take cannabis off its schedule 1 classification seems logical. Considering that cannabis legalization has found its way to the desk of many governors, it was only a matter of time until marijuana, that has long shared the same classification as heroin and LSD, be classified as&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="wp-block-image">
<figure class="alignright size-full"><a href="https://i0.wp.com/vermonttrafficticket.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/DRE-sheet.png?ssl=1" target="_blank" rel=" noreferrer noopener"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="298" height="386" src="/static/2025/08/image-30.png" alt="Drug Influence Evaluation" class="wp-image-397" srcset="/static/2025/08/image-30.png 298w, /static/2025/08/image-30-232x300.png 232w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 298px) 100vw, 298px" /></a><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">A sample DRE evaluation sheet shows the depth of the evidence obtained by law enforcement</figcaption></figure></div>


<p>The <a href="https://apnews.com/article/marijuana-biden-dea-criminal-justice-pot-f833a8dae6ceb31a8658a5d65832a3b8" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">announcement</a>&nbsp;by the Federal Government that they intend to take cannabis off its schedule 1 classification seems logical. Considering that cannabis legalization has found its way to the desk of many governors, it was only a matter of time until marijuana, that has long shared the same classification as heroin and LSD, be classified as less serious, although still federally illegal.</p>



<p>Vermont passed&nbsp;<a href="https://www.mpp.org/states/vermont/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">a legalization law&nbsp;</a>in 2022, becoming the 11th&nbsp;state&nbsp;to do so. Cannabis retail stores have been popping up all over the&nbsp;State&nbsp;ever since, allowing anyone over the age of 21 the ability to purchase a multitude of cannabis based products. Despite the ease of posession, the concern for the impairing effect that marijuana can have on operators of motor vehicles, continues to be a significant concern for law enforcement.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading" id="h-driving-while-high-is-as-illegal-as-driving-while-drunk"><strong>Driving While High Is as Illegal as Driving While Drunk</strong></h2>



<p>The&nbsp;<a target="_blank" href="https://legislature.vermont.gov/statutes/section/23/013/01201" rel="noreferrer noopener">DUI statute</a>&nbsp;for driving while under the influence of marijuana carries the same maximum penalty ( 2 years in jail) as the DUI-alcohol statute. For a law enforcement officer to charge someone with a weed DUI, they must show&nbsp;that the operator was “under the influence to the slightest degree”.&nbsp;Any level of impairment is sufficient to meet the statutory requirements and subject the driver to a mandatory 90-day license suspension and a criminal conviction on your record.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading" id="h-how-does-law-enforcement-prove-impairment"><strong>How Does Law Enforcement Prove Impairment?</strong></h2>



<p>There is no per-se limit&nbsp;on cannabis DUIs. This differs from the .08 limit in alcohol DUIs. In response, marijuana DUI investigation focuses more on an officer’s observations and specialized training in determining impairment. Although the classic Cheech and Chong scene, where the officer approaches the two stoners who are lost in their van in a giant plume of smoke, such apparent evidence of consumption is not needed for an officer to reach an arrest decision.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading" id="h-request-or-demand-for-blood"><strong>Request or Demand for Blood.</strong></h2>



<p>An officer can also request that a suspect submit to a blood test in order to determine the presence of cannabis in their system. The <a href="https://legislature.vermont.gov/statutes/section/23/013/01202">Implied Consent</a> laws for refusing to submit to a blood&nbsp;test&nbsp;are the same as an alcohol test refusal (six-month suspension for a first offense, with elevated penalties for subsequent offenses).</p>



<p>Depending on the circumstances of the arrest, an officer may also be able to apply for a search warrant from a judge if suspect consent is not obtained. This process is often initiated in cases where a serious injury or death has occurred, or if the suspect has prior DUI (alcohol or cannabis) convictions.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading" id="h-just-because-you-can-doesn-t-mean-you-should"><strong>Just Because You Can Doesn’t Mean You Should</strong></h2>



<p>Despite cannabis being available for legal purchase throughout many Vermont towns, this permitted consumption does not extend to the road. So when you purchase that pack of joints from your neighborhood weed dealer keep in mind, that when it comes to driving while impaired, Vermont law enforcement will not look the other way just because you chose weed over&nbsp;booze.</p>



<p><em>The&nbsp;foregoing&nbsp;content is for informational purposes only and should not be&nbsp;considered&nbsp;legal advice. Readers with specific legal questions should consult with&nbsp;their private attorney.</em></p>



<p></p>
]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
    </channel>
</rss>